ON-button cc-licensed, see http://www.flickr.com/photos/troed/3326196676 (yes I can has GIMP skillz)

animate “how are THOUGHTS .. MADE” (remove the “every idea” here and revisit at the end)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Frans_Hals_-_Portret_van_Ren%C3%A9_Descartes.jpg Descartes is about there being an observer. thus, an external I (dualism)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kevinreed/2992674269/ Dennett about the self being an illusion, determinism includes predictive choices (good explanation here: http://reason.com/archives/2003/05/01/pulling-our-own-strings/1 ) if time: looong pres on qualia, mentioning blackmore and monica and how inputs becomes outputs. compare with “the computer didn’t want to .. “

brain takes in sensory input and generates output (movement, speech etc) tie this together with the we’re not filtering gadget later

information doubling rates http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2006/02/the_speed_of_in.php has numbers, more can be found in the documentary TechnoCalyps citing Robert Anton Wilson 1, 1500, 1750, 1900, 1950, 1960 … now every year (Kevin says 18 months) – so between 6 and 24 http://wikibin.org/articles/the-jumping-jesus-phenomenon.html important to name a final number just to shock? http://www.flickr.com/photos/lenbo/2032842547/

and information and bright ideas are closely linked http://www.flickr.com/photos/sashafatcat/2950371787/

there’s no lack of information, there’s a lack of filtering (re we’re all filtering the world for others) but

“we don’t just filter the information, we … “

we massage and create something new. just like a neural network takes a complex input and produces a symbol” = my main message because attention is one of few scarce resources

if time: tie in personal broadcasting with devices with AR as ever present receiver of curated info? http://www.flickr.com/photos/kk/5057390/ (replacing this picture with one from the actual conference I’m presenting it atm would be sooo nice)

Excellent book on gift economy: Tor Norretranders – The Generous Man

picture: “Richard Stallman, founder of the free software movement, the GNU Project, and the Free Software Foundation. (Born 1953.)” http://www.flickr.com/photos/dunechaser/160405823/ meme: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_your_base_are_belong_to_us

O’Reilly: This photo is licensed under a Creative Commons license. If you use this photo, please list the photo credit as "Scott Beale / Laughing Squid" and link the credit to laughingsquid.com. 

enter pirate kitteh as well http://cheezburger.com/View.aspx?aid=2350521600

IMPORTANT: I’m not saying RMS nor Tim O’Reilly has anything to do with the Pirate Party! Lots of room for misunderstanding here. ... the conclusion is one of openness

... and another name for openness is the participatory culture

... and this is nothing new, really, Hippel has been talking about this since the 70s

... and a lot of people apparently read Hippel’s ideas since customer involvement went up ;)

consumer is someone who receives one way communication customer is someone who might get a word in colleague is someone you work WITH <--- that’s what we want so how’s innovation done, then?

this is how we used to ”innovate”

open components becoming the norm (like linux + webkit for software platforms) is a huge de-fragmentation

a paper that supports the notion of scratching an itch but – what else does it say? include Tor Nörretranders extrinsic views on ”making the world a better place” (see The Generous Man)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/vermininc/3437337311/

quote from Arthur, lizard from Seth what Seth Godin refers to as the lizard brain: http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2010/01/quieting-the-lizard-brain.html

factory photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/whsimages/954443940/ quote from “Linchpin” - Seth Godin What factory owners want is compliant, low-paid, replaceable cogs to run their efficient machines. Factories created productivity, and productivity produced profits. It was fun while it lasted (for the factory owners). Our society is struggling because during times of change, the very last people you need on your team are well-paid bureaucrats, note takers, literalists, manual readers, TGIF laborers, map followers, and fearful employees. The compliant masses don't help so much when you don't know what what to do next. What we want, what we need, what we must have are indispensable human beings. We need original thinkers, provocateurs, and people who care. We need marketers who can lead, salespeople able to risk making a human connection, passionate change makers willing to be shunned if it is necessary for them to make a point. Every organization needs a linchpin, the one person who can bring it together and make a difference. Some organizations haven't realized this yet, or haven't articulated it yet, but we need artists.  Artists are people with a genius for finding a new answer, a new connection, or a new way of getting things done. “What happens when the factory goes away?” - http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2010/03/the-factory-in-the-center.html the idea of the process which just needs feeding to produce results Is dead

starfish and the spider (brafman & beckstrom) self organizing vs centrally controlled ”leaderless organisations” starfish: http://www.flickr.com/photos/topyti/2314697295/ spider: http://www.flickr.com/photos/vickisnature/4248737993/

how to select cannot predict the stock market neither innovation (open source is like basic research) Selecting apps is like trying to be a VC. Expect to fail often.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/digitalart/1129398927/

so is it all futile? just go to the casino? (prettier picture, but a little too stylish: http://www.flickr.com/photos/discopalace/478057069 )

http://www.opte.org/maps/ it’s about finding the hubs, the opportunities

this slide could be remade to better reflect to hubs of social networks and where to do your curation

it’s heeeereeee .. and has been for some time

conclusion, every idea counts because … … we are all curating, pattern matching, making the world simpler for the ones around us “making sense of the world for each other” (too close to the “Minds run […]” message to run by itself – adding to next end-of-pres slide)

innovation Troed Sångberg blogs.sonyericsson.com/troedsangberg twitter.com/troed ;

philosophies of Mind

http://www.flickr.com/photos/trentstrohm/205858578/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kevinreed/2992674269/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/lorelei-ranveig/2294885420/

1950 … 1 CE 1500 1750 1900 http://www.flickr.com/photos/lenbo/2032842547/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lenbo/2032842547/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/sashafatcat/2950371787/

"We are like dwarfs standing [or sitting] upon the shoulders of giants, and so able to see more and see farther than the ancients." Bernard of Chartres ~1130 CE

Information is the giant upon whose shoulders we’re standing

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jhf/2771447581/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/todbot/96085777/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kk/5057390/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/tirch/3905578828/

Free only exists if all you know is the gold economy

http://www.flickr.com/photos/niosh/2492023651/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/dunechaser/160405823/ all your source are belong to us

(cc) Scott Beale / laughingsquid.com

changing customer involvement Evolution of Openness – Open Innovation in Historical Perspective - Saarinen, J from: User-Driven Innovation - http://www.foranet.dk

ustomer olleague onsumer c c c

closed innovation

standardization ”there shall be twelve teeth around a central ring with one single hole and the teeth shall be flat tipped with angled sides and the diameter must be closely correlated to individual business needs depending on the region the majority of the sales is going to be made in and … ”

open

Intrinsic Motivation in Open Source Software Development This papers sheds light on the puzzling evidence that even though open source software (OSS) is a public good, it is developed for free by highly qualified, young and motivated individuals, and evolves at a rapid pace. We show that once OSS development is understood as the private provision of a public good, these features emerge quite naturally. We adapt a dynamic private-provision-of-public-goods model to reflect key aspects of the OSS phenomenon. In particular, instead of relying on extrinsic motives (e.g. signaling) the present model is driven by intrinsic motives of OSS programmers, such as user- programmers, play value or 'homo ludens' payoff, and gift culture benefits. Such intrinsic motives feature extensively in the wider OSS literature and contribute new insights to the economic analysis. http://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpdc/0505007.html Jürgen Bitzer, Wolfram Schrettl & Philipp J.H. Schröder

meritocracy “The essence of meritocracy is remarkably similar to Darwin’s ‘survival of the fittest’” http://blog.limkitsiang.com/2008/07/17/university-of-malaya-medical-student-intake/

SCARY http://www.flickr.com/photos/vermininc/3437337311/

“The old principle lives on because practitioners are not comfortable with the vision – and promise – of the new” The Nature of Technology – W. Brian Arthur Linchpin – Seth Godin

http://www.flickr.com/photos/whsimages/954443940/ ”What happens when the factory goes away?”

http://www.flickr.com/photos/topyti/2314697295/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/vickisnature/4248737993/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/bhollar/2882204836 which bubble will burst next ?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/digitalart/1129398927/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnwardell/80126695/

http://www.opte.org/maps/

site http://deleket.deviantart.com/art/Sleek-XP-Basic-Icons-97279032 - search - social

Minds run the semantic web

… and that’s why we’re here

Troed Sångberg blogs.sonyericsson.com/troedsangberg twitter.com/troed ; making sense of the world for each other