2. The Scientific Consensus (The Global Warming Debate)

+10

No comments posted yet

Comments

Slide 2

IPCC. (2007). Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 851pp. (B. Metz, O. Davidson, P. Bosch, R. Dave, & L. Meyer, Eds.) Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. IPCC. (2007). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 996 pp. (S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, et al., Eds.) United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. IPCC. (2007). Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 976pp. (M. Parry, O. Canziani, J. Palutikof, P. van der Linden, & C. Hanson, Eds.) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univeristy Press.

Slide 3

IPCC. (2007). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 996 pp. (S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. Averyt, M. Tignor, et al., Eds.) United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. IPCC. (2007). Working Group I Fourth Assessment Report Expert and Government Review Comments on the Second-Order Draft Chapter 9. Retrieved November 2, 2008, from Harvard University Library: http://pds.lib.harvard.edu/pds/view/7787808

Slide 4

IPCC. (2007). Summary for Policymakers. In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. Averyt, et al. (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1-18). Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Slide 5

AAAS Board of Directors. (2006, December 9). AAAS Board Statement on Climate Change. Retrieved May 26, 2008, from AAAS: http://www.aaas.org/news/press_room/climate_change/mtg_200702/aaas_climate_statement.pdf ACS. (2007). Statement on Global Climate Change. Retrieved May 26, 2008, from American Chemical Society: http://portal.acs.org/portal/fileFetch/C/WPCP_007661/pdf/WPCP_007661.pdf AGU. (2007, December). Human Impacts on Climate. Retrieved May 26, 2008, from American Geophysical Union: http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/policy/positions/climate_change2008.shtml AMS Council. (2007, February 1). Climate Change: An Information Statement of the American Meteorological Society. Retrieved May 26, 2008, from American Meteorological Society: http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/2007climatechange.pdf Peters, M., Benson, S., Cerling, T., Curry, J., Enzel, Y., Finley, J., et al. (2006, October). Global Climate Change. Retrieved May 27, 2008, from Geological Society of America: http://www.geosociety.org/positions/pos10_climate.pdf Joint Academies. (2008, June). Joint Science Academies’ Statement: Climate Change Adaptation and the Transition to a Low Carbon Society. Retrieved June, 2008, from The National Academies: http://www.nationalacademies.org/includes/climatechangestatement.pdf

Slide 6

Joint Academies. (2008, June). Joint Science Academies’ Statement: Climate Change Adaptation and the Transition to a Low Carbon Society. Retrieved June, 2008, from The National Academies: http://www.nationalacademies.org/includes/climatechangestatement.pdf

Slide 8

Global Warming Petition Project. (2008). Retrieved May 29, 2008, from Global Warming Petition Project: http://www.petitionproject.com/ Achenbach, J. (2006, May 28). The Tempest. Retrieved May 27, 2008, from The Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/23/AR2006052301305_pf.html

Slide 9

Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs. (2007, December 3). U.S. Actions to Address Energy Security, Clean Development, and Climage Change . Retrieved May 28, 2008, from U.S. Department of State: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/96165.pdf ExxonMobil Annual Reports. Retrieved May 29, 2008, from ExxonMobil: http://ir.exxonmobil.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=115024&p=irol-reportsAnnual

Slide 11

IPCC. (2007). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 996 pp. (S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. Averyt, M. Tignor, et al., Eds.) United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. Singer, S. F. (Ed.). (2008, March). Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate. Summary for Policymakers of the Report of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change. Chicago: The Heartland Institute.

Slide 12

SEPP. (1995, 2005). The Leipzig declaration on global climate change (2005, revised). Retrieved May 30, 2008, from Science & Environmental Policy Project: http://www.sepp.org/policy%20declarations/LDrevised.html Morano, M. (2007, December 20). U.S. Senate Report: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works: http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=f80a6386-802a-23ad-40c8-3c63dc2d02cb International Climate Science Coalition & Heartland Institute. (2008, March 3). Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from International Climate Science Coalition: http://www.climatescienceinternational.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37&Itemid=1 Global Warming Petition Project. (2008). Retrieved May 29, 2008, from Global Warming Petition Project: http://www.petitionproject.com/

Slide 14

Macilwain, C. (1998). Petition strengthens hand of global warming sceptics. Nature , 639.

Slide 15

Global Warming Petition Project. (2008). Qualifications of Signers. Retrieved May 29, 2008, from Global Warming Petition Project: http://www.petitionproject.com/gwdatabase/GWPP/Qualifications_Of_Signers.html

Slide 16

Global Warming Petition Project. (2008). Qualifications of Signers. Retrieved May 29, 2008, from Global Warming Petition Project: http://www.petitionproject.com/gwdatabase/GWPP/Qualifications_Of_Signers.html

Slide 17

Global Warming Petition Project. (2008). Qualifications of Signers. Retrieved May 29, 2008, from Global Warming Petition Project: http://www.petitionproject.com/gwdatabase/GWPP/Qualifications_Of_Signers.html

Slide 18

Scientific American. (2005, March 5). Skepticism about Sceptics. Retrieved Summer 2007, from Scientific American: http://www.sciam.com/page.cfm?section=sidebar&articleID=0004F43C-DC1A-1C6E-84A9809EC588EF21

Slide 20

Hertsgaard, M. (2006, May). While Washington Slept: Politics & Power. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from Vanity Fair: http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2006/05/warming200605?currentPage=1 Kouri, R. E. (1997, June 6). District of Columbia City of Washington Affidavit of Dr. Richard E. Kouri. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from Tobacco Documents Online: http://tobaccodocuments.org/ctr/CTRMN043690-3694.html Fyock, J. A. (1979, June 15). A Discussion of Tobacco Industry and R.J. Reynolds Industries' Support of Bio-Medical Research. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from Tobacco Documents Online: http://tobaccodocuments.org/bliley_rjr/504480470-0475.html

Slide 21

Hobbs, W. (1984). 1984 Report of the Council for Tobacco Research. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from Tobacco Documents Online: http://tobaccodocuments.org/ctr/CTRMN012459-2533.html?zoom=750&ocr_position=above_foramatted&start_page=1&end_page=75 Stokes, C. (1979, November). RJR's Support of Biomedical Research International Advisory Board. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from Tobacco Documents Online: http://tobaccodocuments.org/ness/29154.html

Slide 22

Stokes, C. (1979, November). RJR's Support of Biomedical Research International Advisory Board. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from Tobacco Documents Online: http://tobaccodocuments.org/ness/29154.html

Slide 23

Schulz, N. (2006, April 14). Vanity Scare. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from TCS Daily: http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=041406F Holtzman, A. (1989, August 31). Fred Seitz. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from Tobacco Documents Online: http://tobaccodocuments.org/pm/2023266534.html?pattern=fred%5Ba-z%5D%2A%5CW%2Bseitz%5Ba-z%5D%2A&#p1

Slide 24

Oreskes, N. (2004). Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change. Science , 1686.

Slide 25

Peiser, B. (2005, January 4). The letter Science Magazine refused to publish. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from Benny Peiser: http://www.staff.livjm.ac.uk/spsbpeis/Scienceletter.htm Lambert, T. (2005, May 6). Peiser’s 34 abstracts. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from Deltoid: http://timlambert.org/2005/05/peiser/ Media Watch. (2006, October 30). Bolt's Minority View. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from ABC.net.au: http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s1777013.htm

Slide 26

Lambert, T. (2007, September 9). Schulte Replies to Oreskes. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from Deltoid: http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2007/09/schulte_replies_to_oreskes.php Littlemore, R. (2007, September 20). Schulte's Analysis: Not Published; Not Going to Be. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from Desmogblog: http://www.desmogblog.com/schultes-analysis-not-published-not-going-to-be Schulte, K.-M. (2008). Scientific Consensus on Climate Change? Energy and Environment , 281-286.

Slide 27

Dempsey, M. (2007, August 29). Breaking: Less Than Half of all Published Scientists Endorse Global Warming Theory. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works: http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=B35C36A3-802A-23AD-46EC-6880767E7966 Asher, M. (2007, August 29). Survey: Less Than Half of all Published Scientists Endorse Global Warming Theory. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from DailyTech: http://www.dailytech.com/Survey+Less+Than+Half+of+all+Published+Scientists+Endorse+Global+Warming+Theory/article8641.htm Thomson Reuters. (n.d.). Master Journal List. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from Scientific: http://scientific.thomson.com/mjl/

Slide 1

The scientific consensus Who believes what? The Global Warming Debate part 2 Click Play Button To Begin Email comments or corrections to cce1976@gmail.com Supporting information located at http://cce.890m.com Click “cc” button for citations

Slide 2

The IPCC Working Group I (WGI) – The Physical Science Basis Working Group II (WGII) – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerabilities Working Group III (WGIII) – Mitigation of Climate Change Syntheses

Slide 3

Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) Working Group I 619 coordinating lead authors, lead authors, and contributing authors “reviewers” are not required to be “experts” 30,000 comments

Slide 4

Summary for policymakers Consensus documents Conservative! Governments and scientists must approve SPM “Warming of the climate system is unequivocal.” “Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely (>90% probability) due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.”

Slide 5

Consensus census American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) American Chemical Society (ACS) American Geophysical Union (AGU) American Meteorological Society (AMS) Geological Society of America (GSA) Science Academies of the G8+5 Nations

Slide 6

Science Academy signatures

Slide 7

Progression of skeptics Warming? Human caused? Dangerous? Adapt!

Slide 8

Think tank roundup Competitive Enterprise Institute George Marshall Institute Cato Institute Heartland Institute American Enterprise Institute . . . and the rest!

Slide 9

Turning the tables (and then turning them back) Industry shills ? Greedy scientists! How much is the climate worth?

Slide 10

A cottage industry Industry support dwindling But no shortage of opinion Books TV Appearances Newspaper Op-Eds International conferences!

Slide 11

Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate Summary for Policymakers of the Report† of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change* †Nonexistent *621 authors ~1000 pages One hand too many ?

Slide 12

The Oregon Petition A few lists Leipzig Declaration Inhofe 400 Manhattan Declaration Oregon Petition (1998) Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine (OISM) Arthur B. Robinson 2 sons 2 dead 3 others Frederick Seitz cover letter

Slide 13

“Review of information on the subject of global warming” 1998 paper Robinson (biochemist) Baliunas & Soon (astrophysicists) Zachary Robinson Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences? (No) 2007 paper Drops Baliunas Swaps Zachary for Noah Robinson Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons

Slide 14

“Virtually every scientist in every field got it.” 17,000 signatures (1998) 14,000 signatures (2007) 10 million with scientific degrees in US 500,000 Ph.D.s Persistence pays off

Slide 15

31,072 scientists

Slide 16

Atmospheric, Earth, & Environmental Scientists

Slide 17

Atmospheric scientists

Slide 18

Scientific American survey

Slide 19

A tobacco interlude Frederick Seitz National Academy of Sciences President (1962-1969) Rockefeller University Hired by the Tobacco Industry in 1979 $45 million

Slide 20

“Free rein” “For his part, Seitz says he was comfortable taking tobacco money, ‘as long as it was green. I’m not quite clear about this moralistic issue. We had absolutely free rein to decide how the money was spent.’ Did the research give the tobacco industry political cover? ‘I’ll leave that to the philosophers and priests,’ he replies.” “They didn’t want us looking at the health effects of cigarette smoking.”

Slide 21

The public campaign

Slide 22

The search for the “true causes of cancer”

Slide 23

The road to Oregon George Marshall Institute (est. 1984) Oregon Petition (1998 & 2007) Ozone depletion and “2nd hand smoke” too!

Slide 24

The Oreskes survey Naomi Oreskes Professor of history and science studies B.S. in mining geology Ph.D. in geological research and the history of science 928 abstracts (1993-2003) 75% explicitly or implicitly endorsed consensus 25% no position None rejected consensus

Slide 25

The Peiser survey Benny Peiser Social anthropologist Letter to Science Searched all documents and databases 34 articles “reject or doubt” consensus Only one met his revised criteria “I have publicly withdrawn this point of my critique” American Association of Petroleum Geologists “overwhelming majority of climatologists” agree with consensus

Slide 26

The Schulte survey Klaus-Martin Schulte Endocrinologist Same papers from rejected Peiser letter Energy and Environment (E&E) Peiser on editorial board Political scientist editor “a bit patchy and nothing new”

Slide 27

“Less than half of all published scientists endorse global warming theory” “By contrast [to the IPCC’s authors], the ISI Web of Science database covers 8,700 journals and publications, including every leading scientific journal in the world!” . . . but not E&E

Slide 28

Consensus ≠ science True! But . . . Policy is done by consensus! “Hope for the best, but . . . how does that go again?”

Slide 29

(hyperlink) Return to The Global Warming Debate website

Summary: Consensus means different things to different people, and many debates remain within climate science. However, what can be said is that there exists a strong consensus that humans are now playing a significant role in the climate, primarily due to the emission of greenhouse gases.

Tags: ipcc scientific societies think tanks oregon petition oreskes peiser schulte

URL: