Levitt Lecture 10-31-2011 / e-Patient Dave

0

No comments posted yet

Comments

Slide 1

“e-Patient Dave” deBronkart Twitter: @ePatientDave facebook.com / ePatientDave LinkedIn.com / in / ePatientDave dave@epatientdave.com The Copernican Shift The World Looks Different with the Patient at the Center

Slide 2

Pumpkin House, Kenova WV Steven Wayne Rotsch, Facebook, 10/30/2011

Slide 3

E Today’s lecture is brought to you by the letter...

Slide 4

Equipped Engaged Empowered Enabled” Doc Tom said, “e-Patients are

Slide 5

How I came to be here High tech marketing Data geek; tech trends; automation 2007: Cancer kicker 2008: E-Patient blogger 2009: Participatory Medicine, Public Speaker 2010: full time

Slide 6

Foundation Principles Patient is not a third person word Your time will come It’s a collective noun. Patients are the ultimate stakeholder Yet they’re often omitted from planning the future

Slide 7

“I want to note especially the importance of the resource that is most often under- utilized in our information systems – our patients” Charles Safran MD, Beth Israel Deaconess quoting his colleague, Warner Slack MD Testimony to the House Ways & Means subcommittee on health, 2004

Slide 8

The Cause? Mostly due to unregulated fee-for-service payments and an over reliance on rescue/specialty care. This is stark evidence that the U.S. health care industry has been failing us for years. “Commonly cited causes for the nation's poor performance are not to blame - it is the failure of the delivery system!!” - “Unaccountable Care Organizations” * Peter A. Muennig and Sherry A. Glied Health Affairs Oct. 7, 2010 Dubuque, Iowa USA 2011 Source: Paul Grundy MD, head of worldwide healthcare, IBM

Slide 11

SPM’s blog

Slide 12

SPM’s journal, JoPM.org

Slide 13

Pt of future

Slide 15

Me? An indicator of the future?? Who’s getting online: 1989: Me (CompuServe sysop) 2009: 83% of US adults (Pew) Who’s romancing online: 1999: I met my wife (Match.com) 2009: One in eight weddings in the U.S. met online 2011: One in five couples met online

Slide 16

JAMIA, 1997 1997

Slide 17

The Engaged Patient 12 items in my pre-appointment “agenda” email

Slide 18

The Incidental Finding Routine shoulder x-ray, Jan. 2, 2007 “Your shoulder will be fine … but there’s something in your lung”

Slide 19

Multiple tumors in both lungs Where’s This From??

Slide 20

Primary Tumor: Kidney

Slide 21

E-Patient Activity 1: Researching my condition

Slide 22

Classic Stage IV, Grade 4 Renal Cell Carcinoma Illustration on the drug company’s web site Median Survival: 24 weeks

Slide 23

Facing the Reaper

Slide 24

My mother

Slide 25

My daughter

Slide 26

After the shock you’re left with the question: What are my options? What can I do?

Slide 27

Get engaged. Get it in gear. Do everything you can.

Slide 28

E-Patient Activity 2: “My doctor prescribed ACOR” (Community of my patient peers)

Slide 29

ACOR members told me: This is an uncommon disease – get to a hospital that does a lot of cases There’s no cure, but HDIL-2 sometimes works. When it does, about half the time it’s permanent The side effects are severe. Don’t let them give you anything else first Here are four doctors in your area who do it And one was the onc I was already being steered to

Slide 30

E-Patient Activity 3: Reading (and sharing) my hospital data online

Slide 31

E-Patient Activity 4: My own social support network (CaringBridge.org - family and friends - journal & guestbook)

Slide 32

E-Patient Activity 5: Tracking my Data During a serious disease, the chance to be engaged (or to help) is a huge mood booster, infinitely better than “I’m helpless / there’s nothing I can do”

Slide 33

Surgery & Interleukin worked. Target Lesion 1 – Left Upper Lobe

Slide 34

Nice curve!

Slide 35

E-Patient Activity 6: Start a blog (pay it forward)

Slide 36

Get educated / get engaged

Slide 37

“e-Patient?” I know one when I see one.

Slide 38

Question:

Slide 39

How can it be that the most useful and relevant and up-to-the-minute information can exist outside of traditional channels?

Slide 40

“If I read two journal articles every night, at the end of a year I’d be 400 years behind.” It’s not humanly possible to keep up. Dr. Lindberg: 400 years

Slide 41

The lethal lag time: 2-5 years During this time, people who might have benefitted can die. Patients have all the time in the world to look for such things. The time it takes after successful research is completed before publication is completed and the article’s been read.

Slide 42

Compare with - “To Err is Human” (98,000 deaths/yr Nov 1999) Death by Googling: Not. (Dr. Gunther Eysenbach, Europe: 0 deaths found in a three year search) - HHS Inspector General (15,000/mo Nov 2010)

Slide 43

“It may be more dangerous not to google “your condition.”

Slide 44

“These conclusions are no more anti-doctor or anti-medicine than Copernicus and Galileo ..were anti-astronomer.” Patients can simply contribute more today than in the past.

Slide 45

Charlene Li (“Groundswell”) “Social networks will be like air” Web 2.0: “When the web began to harness the intelligence of its users” – Tim O’Reilly

Slide 46

House to his residents, 2012 ? “OK, you’re out of ideas. So, what? You think what you learned three years ago is all the knowledge there is??” “You think nothing new has come up since then??” “You’re busy; have you asked the family if they can dig up anything useful?”

Slide 47

Because of the Web, Patients Can Connect to Information and Each Other (and other Providers)

Slide 48

Cluetrain Manifesto, 1999: “Markets are Conversations”

Slide 49

17 first hand stories

Slide 50

How a kidney cancer wife found the info she needed No insurance; no treatment. Then: Three bad hospitals; no help. Then: A friend said “I know a guy... on Twitter”

Slide 51

Robin Martinez Listowner, Kidney-Onc list [ACOR.org] Kidney-Onc isn’t “work.” It’s more like running in a marathon that never ends. It’s for a good cause. Sometimes the runner runs faster and sometimes slower; but the running is not going to stop unless the runner gives up hope. Hope and camaraderie are what we live on. Fortunately, we create our own.

Slide 52

This is Ben Sent home to die at 7 mos (2 months ago) Desperate, the family got online and found e-patient families. Ben got surgery, is well now.

Slide 53

“I want to note especially the importance of the resource that is most often under- utilized in our information systems – our patients” Charles Safran MD, Beth Israel Deaconess quoting his colleague, Warner Slack MD Testimony to the House Ways & Means subcommittee on health, 2004

Slide 54

Patient Centered Outcomes Patient Reported Outcomes How about... Patient Defined Outcomes??

Slide 55

2.8 e-Patient Years in Pictures…

Slide 57

Complexity can clear up when you get the model right. Source: Wikipedia, Copernican Revolution

Slide 58

Additional Sessions 2:00-3:00: Working with engaged patients when they come to you armed with knowledge With Robin Martinez 3:15-4:15: What is patient engagement? What specifically is it (two models) and how can we develop it?

Slide 59

“e-Patient Dave” deBronkart Twitter: @ePatientDave facebook.com / ePatientDave LinkedIn.com / in / ePatientDave dave@epatientdave.com The Copernican Shift The World Looks Different with the Patient at the Center

Summary: The Copernican Shift : The World Looks Different with the Patient at the Center

Tags: healthcare e-patient participatory medicine levitt lecture

URL: