Differing Site Conditions

0

No comments posted yet

Comments

Slide 1

Differing Site Conditions (DSC) Process to determine, analyze, present, and adjudicate a differing site condition. By Dr. Peter J. Tarkoy WWW.GeoConSol.COM

Slide 2

What makes you suspect a DSC? By experiencing: Delays, slower progress High usage of supplies, tools, support High rate of equipment wear Costlier construction in general

Slide 3

Cause of delays & excess costs? Excess Time For repair & maintenance To excavate, support, etc. Excess Supplies Tools Equipment wear Increase manpower to maintain schedule

Slide 4

Standards for Preparing DSC Claim What are the components? How are the necessary requirements fulfilled?

Slide 5

Components of a DSC Claim A DSC consists of two parts namely: Entitlement Quantum ($)

Slide 6

Elements for Entitlement in DSCs Industry Standards For geotechnical differing site conditions, entitlement must be analyzed, established, and presented according to the following principles: There must be a difference between reasonable anticipated and documented encountered conditions, There has to be a difference between reasonable anticipated and documented encountered construction performance, A cause-and-effect relationship must be demonstrable between the differences in conditions and difference in construction performance, There must be a demonstrable impact on time or costs, Contract conditions must be fulfilled (reliance, notice, mitigation) and No other factors (self-inflicted) can have caused the difference between anticipated and encountered performance.

Slide 7

Step 1 – to establish entitlement? Establish: Current geological condition that may be causing the delay Geological condition that was indicated in the contract documents or anticipated based on factual pre-bid information Determine if there is a difference

Slide 8

Step 2 – to establish entitlement? Is there a difference between: Reasonable anticipated construction performance and Documented encountered construction performance?

Slide 9

Case 1.1 – Clay zone in rock tunnel

Slide 10

Case 1.2 – Clay zone in rock tunnel Tunnel boring machine encountered a clay zone in a rock tunnel, The machine sank into the invert, The ground had to be stabilized and the machine re-aligned, and Normal excavation had to be resumed

Slide 11

Case 1.3 – Clay zone in rock tunnel Was the unanticipated condition compensable under the differing site condition clause? Let us take a look at the borings to see what should have been anticipated. In the tunnel zone of concern, we found the following core ------

Slide 12

Case 1.4 – Clay zone in rock tunnel

Slide 13

Case 1.5 - Clay zone in rock tunnel Observation The boring showed RQD=10% The core was deeply altered It was an indication of a shear zone The encountered condition was consistent with indications in the rock core Conclusion A DSC cannot be demonstrated

Slide 14

Step 3 – to establish entitlement? Is there a cause & effect relationship? Between: Differences in conditions and Differences in performance?

Slide 15

Step ? – to establish entitlement? Is an impact demonstrable? In time, In space, and Related to the unanticipated condition.

Slide 16

Step ? – to establish entitlement? Have the contra\ct conditions been fulfilled, namely: Reliance Notice Mitigation

Slide 17

Step ? – to establish entitlement? Were there any other causes that may have resulted in: Increased project time & costs? Were there any self-inflicted problems?

Summary: A guide to examine, analyze, present, evaluate, and adjudicate Differing Site Condition entitlement.

Tags: differing site condition entitlement.

URL: