Project AFOLD - JHU ME Senior Project 2007

0

No comments posted yet

Comments

Slide 1

Welcome… team AFOLD Automated Folding Operation Layer with Deflector Alican Demir Evan Miller James Weisheit Joe Romano

Slide 2

Current Device in Action

Slide 3

Current Device in Action The System ■ High-speed paper folding mechanism ■ Adjusts type of fold (half-fold, tri-fold, no-fold, etc.) by varying the number and/or type of fold plates encountered by the paper. ■ Adjustment of length of each folded panel by moving the location of a mechanical stop along the folding plate.

Slide 4

Introduction Objective Development of a fully automated fold-plate that will allow the customer to easily readjust the fold specifications by a user-interface without complex disassembly of the folding mechanism…

Slide 5

Introduction Why Automation? (The Problem) ■ The machine needs to be stopped and the plates taken apart by hand in order to: □ Change the location of the paper folding-line. □ Adjust the number of folds by inserting or removing "deflector“ and/or “stopper” plates. ► Induces labor intensity, time consumption, inaccuracy, and complicated operator training.

Slide 6

Constraints/Limitations Physical Constraints ■ Design volume constraint: 400mm wide x 275mm long x 60mm thick. ■ Mechanism Repeatability +/- 1 mm of set value ■ Minimum fold panel length 60mm. ■ Maximum fold panel length 200mm. ■ Maximum paper width 310mm.

Slide 7

Constraints/Limitations Other Design Parameters and Limitations ■ Compatibility tested on 8.5in x 11in 20lb bond paper (copy paper) ■ Withstand impact force of 12 sheets at 135 inches/second (3.43m/s) ■ Geometry of "fold stop" must be preserved ■ Geometry, material, and finish of "deflector" must be preserved ■ Max full-range adjustment time: 30 seconds

Slide 8

Design Ideas - I ■ One-piece stopper and deflector in stopper state

Slide 9

Design Ideas - I ■ One-piece stopper and deflector in deflector state

Slide 10

Design Ideas - II ■ “The Claw” deflector

Slide 11

Design Ideas - III □ Power Screw Based Design:

Slide 12

Design Ideas - IV ■ Deflector/stopper design with integration in one plate □ The idea is that the deflector and the stopper could co-exist in one plate without interfering with each other’s operation in a tight tolerance packaging.

Slide 13

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 14

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 15

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 16

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 17

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 18

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 19

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 20

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 21

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 22

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 23

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 24

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 25

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 26

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 27

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 28

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 29

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 30

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 31

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 32

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 33

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 34

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 35

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 36

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 37

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 38

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 39

Final Design - Assembly Stopper mode

Slide 40

Final Design - Assembly

Slide 41

Final Design - Assembly

Slide 42

Final Design - Assembly

Slide 43

Final Design - Assembly

Slide 44

Final Design - Animation

Slide 45

Final Design - Animation

Slide 46

Final Design - Animation

Slide 47

Final Design - Operation

Slide 48

Final Design - Operation

Slide 49

Final Design - Operation Stopper mode

Slide 50

Final Design - Operation Deflector mode

Slide 51

Final Design - Operation

Slide 52

Final Design - Operation

Slide 53

Thank You… We would like to thank Pitney Bowes, and in particular John Masotta, for help in achieving a final design solution and for valuable input along the entire course of the project. We would also like to thank Mike Johnson, Eric Harden , and Kiju Lee for guidance, support, and ideas that have contributed to the final design. Any Questions?

Summary: Presentation of the 2007 Johns Hopkins University Senior Design Project Winner as voted by the Maryland Chapter of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). Project AFOLD, sponsored by Pitney-Bowes. Evan Miller is currently looking to obtain a full-time position in an engineering related field involving account management and technical sales. Please visit his LinkIn profile at http://www.linkedin.com/in/evanjohnsmiller

Tags: johns hopkins university whiting school of engineering mechanical senior design project american society engineers asme winner pitney bowes evan miller sales career opportunities

URL:
More by this User
Most Viewed
Previous Page Next Page
HTS Engineering Company Presentation by Evan Miller
HTS Engineeri...
 
 
 
Previous Page Next Page